Well the Luke Hughes watch fizzled out from about the
time the Defensive Specialist hit the “post” button on the last offering.
You’re old pal isn’t suggesting that he put the kybosh on Luke’s push to make
the Twins big league roster but if you reflect back on the Defensive Specialist’s
efforts to pick winners and forecast the future you’d see a trail of despair
and destruction. The good news is that Hughes is one twanged hamstring away
from a call up to the Big Leagues!
Today’s post is the final instalment of the SWOT
analysis the Defensive Specialist has been working on for what seems like the
past 8 weeks. The topic for consideration on this occasion is the threats to
the growth and success of the ABL. The Defensive Specialist isn’t one to
typically dedicate a post to anyone, but today seemed an appropriate time to
recognise arguably the most unpopular man in Australian baseball – Matt Tolbert,
the guy who beat out Hughes. Here’s to you Matt!
Arguably the biggest threat to the success of the ABL
is a lack of fan support. Without punters coming through the turnstiles, the
league will never be self-sustaining and eventually Major League baseball will
grow disgruntled, cutting the cheques and severing the purse strings. Individual teams and league
administrators have to build on year 1 attendance figures and drive customers
through the gates with creative marketing and solid on-field entertainment. MLB
cannot and will not play the role of sugar daddy forever so it’s imperative
that teams set up solid fan bases and generate consistent revenue streams to
ensure long-term viability.
Recently the Defensive Specialist received a friendly
email from Sydney Blue Sox administrators informing him that foundation members
had to re-up their memberships before April 30 if they wished to maintain their
existing seats. The reason for the push so early in the year? Apparently demand
for memberships is so high that there’s a chance all seating will be taken up
by members in 2011 / 2012. While the Defensive Specialist is sceptical of the
demand for memberships after seeing a multitude of empty seats during the
playoffs, it does pose an interesting question: “Is it a good thing to use up
all seating on members?”
On one hand the franchise is guaranteed revenue (even
if the total amount is less than what would be generated if seats were sold to
casual fans) for the season which allows efficient and accurate budgeting and
franchise management from a financial perspective – you have a fixed revenue
stream from the outset of the season even if people don’t show up to the game.
On the other hand, you are denying the casual fan who shows up for a game a
premium experience because they’re likely to land a seat in a less than optimal
position down one of the baselines (for those unaware, the Blacktown Olympic
facility does not have seating down the foul lines). Would this experience
result in them not returning?
Personally the Defensive Specialist would take the
guaranteed full house and a thriving membership book any day of the week!
While expansion is most definitely an opportunity for
the ABL, it also poses a serious threat. The thought of taking the game to
different markets (NZ, regional Australia) is exciting but also fraught with
trouble. While baseball fans would love to double the numbers of teams in the
competition, serious questions have to be asked first:
- Can the location support the team from a fan and spectator perspective?
- Will local sponsors get on board?
- Can the Australian pool of talent support more teams?
Obviously the first 2 points relate to the financial
wellbeing of clubs. The last point is just as salient as the availability of
quality Australian players is finite and if clubs cannot field competitive
teams then fans and sponsors will not show up.
Adding additional teams also increases cost – travel
and accommodation being the most significant. While it sounds great in theory
to have a team in New Zealand, the cost of getting a team there from Perth is
substantial (mind you the strength of the Australian dollar reduces
accommodation expenses!). The same can be said for having teams in Asia or
tougher to reach Australian locations. Careful consideration has to be given to
a multitude of factors before any new franchise can be added.
While every existing team was able to secure their own
home, questions have to be raised over the quality and location of some of
them. Quality plays a role not only in fan experience but also in determining
whether or not MLB teams will send down their better prospects. The higher
quality prospects we have in Australia, the better the standard of the game and
the more fans that will be drawn. There is no way that a Major League team
would look at the Melbourne Showground sandpit and sign off on one of their
upper echelon prospects playing on it – there is simply too much to risk health
wise.
Location is surely a factor in attendance. In places
like Western Australia and NSW the facilities are located some distance from
the CBD, which works for part of the general public, but add in lack of public
transport and it causes problems for the remainder. Crowd numbers may be strong
at the moment, but location may impact each franchise’s ability to increase
these figures.
While it was important to have a MLB representative
heading up the new ABL in year 1, eventually the lack of Australian leadership
may prove to be detrimental. It is yet to be proven that an Australian can
effectively administrator a competition like the ABL. At some stage Major
League Baseball is going to want to take the training wheels off and see if
this thing can walk on its own. While the jury is out on the management style
of the current regime, the fact remains that the league got off the ground and
ran successfully in its first year. Moving forward and to be truly
self-sustaining, Australians need to step up in to management roles and
administer the league in a profitable manner and the biggest threat is that
they’re not being groomed and prepared to do so.
If you see any potential threats that the Defensive
Specialist may have missed, add them in the comments section below.
1. At the top of my list for ABL threats is nepotism. Given that there are paid jobs in the ABL, there's no need to keep hiring parents of players (junior and senior players). Parents of players vanish when their child has gone as far as they can go. The turnover parents of players cause is a threat, which can be prevented by not hiring them in the first place. Every year hundreds of students graduate from universities around Australia with sports management degrees. The ABL should be reaching out to these graduates, as baseball may be a more open pathway than say AFL or rugby league. Also, ex-players need to be hired for the right jobs. A good ex-player doesn't always make a good sports administrator. NSW Baseball have hired Ian Evans as their CEO, and this is a step in the right direction, as Ian has solid experience in sports management.
ReplyDelete2. I believe that the ABL's best chance to survive long-term is to become a highly desired winter (our summer) baseball league. In order for this to happen the number of games played per week would need to increase, so players are getting work in like they would during a normal season. By doing this teams from Korea, Japan, and Taiwan can also utilise the ABL to assess their playing stocks. Note that there is no minor league as such in Korea. However, I would recommend that these teams from Asia be based here, and share a venue with a local team, i.e. they play when the local team is on the road. For Australian fans this would mean that there is always baseball on at their local venue. I also believe that a league of this scale will attract quality prospects from North America. I am in favour of a team in New Zealand, as an Asia Pacific League has big potential. The teams from Asia could also assist with some of the ABL funding costs. As mentioned above, the teams from Asia should be based here, and with more money invested in the league, flying to New Zealand won't be such a big cost.
I'm bothered by the use of Foxtel as a television vehicle for the ABL. I think it's not sustainable to leave baseball on pay TV indefinitely - it's a model that's causing trouble for soccer in this country right now, with dwindling crowds going hand-in-hand with the lack of free-to-air game broadcasting. It's worth remembering that only around one third of Australian households have pay TV.
ReplyDeleteMaybe this number will increase once the next AFL rights deal is signed and the majority of AFL games are broadcast exclusively on pay, but I still doubt the willingness of the general Australian to shell out the big bucks necessary for pay TV and thus to get the exposure to the ABL. I think staying indefinitely on Foxtel is a threat to the sport; if soccer is stagnating with a pure pay broadcast model, what might happen to the ABL?
Splitting the broadcast rights between Foxtel and say One HD sounds much more viable to me.